Philosophy of History Review Essay Example

Philosophy of History Review Paper Essay on Philosophy of History As far as I can judge from the dictionary of modern Western philosophy of the aforementioned marginal fantasies Talking about the conceptual apparatus used the so-called marginals a departure from the traditional ideas of rationalism, reason and essentialism. Michel Foucault referred (although he denied it) to the fashionable at the time in the west of structuralism (and we all late until now) the basic building blocks of structural analysis (search for the so-called objective knowledge) structure, languages, unconscious on knowledge and history material output: structure and more important primary stories. unconscious concept has received the label of theoretical anti-humanism man a function of discursive practices, point of intersection speech practices. Sartre denounced the structuralists, and in particular, Foucault, describing them as the last stronghold of the bourgeoisie. Jacques Derrida, representative of post-modernism and post-structuralism (neither one nor the other has no common program or the organization). It raises the question of the exhaustion of the resources of the mind in all its forms. Example of his reasoning: living present as such does not exist: the past leaves its mark in it, and the future an outline of its shape. Therefore, the present is not equal to itself, does not coincide with itself. Understanding the events of May 1968: Structures do not take to the streets. In the early 90-ies Derrida refers to Marxs texts. In short, this kind of fantasy Flowing fashionable at the time the flow of pseudo-scientific terms, the value of which, as said in unison, two classics (one correcting the other), Dark il negligible, but them without a pint of impossible to understand.